Proposal for the Continued Growth of the Bucknell Men's Crew Program
Purpose
The purpose of this document is to give key members of the
University a concise opinion on the preferred future of the Bucknell Varsity
Men's Crew team as it relates to pending Title IX decisions. It has been prepared by a group of
Bucknell Crew alumni. This group
has met with University administrators, trustees, and current students to help
understand the current issues faced by the University and the rowing program. Our experience at Bucknell and our
conversations with the above listed constituencies have allowed us to reflect
on these issues and consider alternatives which will help the University
continue to operate a successful rowing program that will carry on the strong
competitive rowing tradition which has been initiated and cultivated by
dedicated students over the course of the last fifteen years.
Current Situation
Bucknell University is currently in its third year of a
five-year program to become compliant with Title IX regulations that mandate
equal athletic opportunities for men and women in proportion to the gender
distribution found in the student body.
The University faces the challenge of eliminating a large gap between
men and women in terms of both athletic opportunities and funding in order to
obtain compliance. Eliminating or
adding a single team will not correct the situation. In order to obtain compliance, many dramatic changes will
need to happen within the Bucknell athletic community including roster caps,
team additions and eliminations, and changes in funding.
As the University is considering the myriad of options, the
elimination of the Bucknell Varsity Men's Crew program rises to the top for
various reasons.
1.
The Men's and Women's program share a coaching staff (one head
coach and volunteer assistant coaches). The elimination of the Men's team would
allow for the coaching staff to solely serve the women's program and offer a
better experience for the women within the rowing program.
2.
Crew is not a Patriot League sport and therefore does not
contribute to the President's Cup.
3.
Men's Crew is not sanctioned by the NCAA.
Although these reasons are valid as it relates to the Title
IX decision, the University community recognizes the benefits that the team
provides to Bucknell.
1.
The opportunity that rowing provides to Bucknell students
perfectly suits the student culture at the university. Bucknell students are
active individuals who are in search of competitive environments and physically
challenging opportunities. For the
last fifteen years,
crew has given students the opportunity to walk-on and join a competitive
athletic program and benefit from a collegiate varsity athletic
experience. These students have
not trained through high school to make the team, as is the case with the
majority of varsity athletes at Bucknell.
Most of the crew team is comprised of students who did not row in high
school, and are thrilled to have the rowing program provide them the
opportunity of competing at the varsity level in college.
2.
The team provides intercollegiate competition with frame of
reference colleges and universities, as well as schools in the upper tier (Ivy
League).
3.
The team consistently has athletes that represent the highest
standards of academic achievement.
4.
Team members have historically played, and continue to play, a
significant role in the operations of the team, providing valuable leadership
opportunities.
5.
The alumni exhibit above average involvement in both the team
and the University after graduation.
Current rowers and alumni, including both men and women, passionately feel that the benefits of the Crew
team are consistent with the overall goals of both the University and the
Athletic Department. Furthermore,
these benefits should be taken very seriously as they are evaluated against the
equation being used to make Title IX decisions.
Implications of a Change to Club Status
Because one of the options being considered, by the
University, is changing the Men's Crew team to a club sport, we would like to
outline the issues that would face the team with a change of status.
- Inadequate
funding would seriously endanger the on-going existence of the team.
The team currently fundraises more than half of its
operating budget. This is achieved
with a constant series of fundraisers that occupy much of the free time of the
varsity team. A change in status
would reduce the funding by the university by approximately 67%. The expectation that the team could
make up this difference with additional fundraisers is unrealistic. Additionally, it would place an unfair
burden on the time of these athletes and could hamper their ability to meet
their academic commitments.
2. Alumni/Parent
fundraising would decrease dramatically.
After reviewing data collected by University
Relations, it is evident that crew alumni (men and women) and parents are
regularly among the top donors to give to a sport at Bucknell. Last year crew alumni and parents were
second in giving among varsity sports.
This reflects the alumni's commitment to the University and the sport of
rowing, as well as parents' support of their child's decision to row. Because a change in status would mean
that the men's crew team would be part of BSG and club sports, donations would
not be able to be given directly to the team. Monetary gifts to club sports are divided among all club
sports. A second concern is that
donations to club sports are not tax deductible. Lastly, club sports do not benefit from the University's
tracking of alumni. This is
critical for successful fundraising campaigns as well as keeping alumni
informed of the current success of the team.
3. Competitiveness
of the team would decrease dramatically.
Varsity athletes' commitment to their sport and
their teammates differs from that of athletes competing at the club level. We are concerned that with the
financial struggles, expense of the sport, and the lack of varsity recognition,
there would be a decrease in competitiveness, both within the team and
nationally. Additionally, the
varsity status allows the Men's Crew team to more effectively recruit and
retain quality rowers, as well as coaches.
4. Threat
to the shared experience between the Men's and Women's rowing programs.
The men's and women's rowing programs have always
had a symbiotic relationship. The
teams have depended on each other in many ways, but particularly
financially. The programs share
most of the equipment and the costs that come with traveling and team
operations. The men's program, as
a club sport, would place a burden on both teams, particularly if the shared
experience would no longer be allowed to continue and develop.
5. Team
selectivity
As a club sport, supported by BSG, crew would not be
allowed to be selective. Club
sports are required to be open to all students who are interested in
participating. This requirement
would place significant burden on the team in terms of competitiveness and
finances.
Due to these factors, we
sincerely feel that a move to club status would mean the end of the Men's Crew
program at Bucknell in the near future.
Ideal Situation
Ideally, we would like to
see the Men's Crew program remain varsity. It would allow the team to continue to grow and compete at a
high level. It would also allow Bucknell
students to participate in a varsity program that has a tradition of graduating
exceptional student athletes who continue to give back to the university and
participate actively as alumni.
However, we recognize that due to Title IX, Bucknell finds itself in a
difficult situation.
A Compromise Proposal
In assessing the situation
with the hope of finding a compromise, our group of alumni identified the
aspects of varsity status that were important to the program. Additionally, we looked at the factors
which are important for the University to achieve compliance with Title
IX. As part of this compromise
proposal, we have identified the three central components which the men's
program would lose, but the loss of which would assist the University in
meeting the requirements set forth by Title IX.
…
Male varsity athletic
opportunities
… University
funding
… Coaching
positions
As we wrestled with the
issue of losing these three components of the program we reached out to rowers
and coaches at other universities who are encountering the same issues. The University of Michigan Athletic
Department (please see attached article) has spearheaded a program that we feel
Bucknell can use as a model, and will help Bucknell with Title IX compliance while
allowing the Men's Crew team to continue to compete at a high level. This model calls for the development of
a new athletic status called Club Varsity. This status would allow the university to eliminate the
sport from the varsity category.
This would benefit Bucknell in terms of Title IX regulations because it
would allow for the University funding, coaching positions, and varsity
athletic opportunities which are currently shared by the men's and women's
programs to be solely allocated to women's athletics. With the Club Varsity distinction, the men's program would
be allowed to retain important components which would contribute to the
legitimacy of the team and ensure its future success both on the water and
financially. The Men's Crew program would continue to have access to:
… The
Bison Club (for fundraising efforts and alumni tracking)
… Continued
insurance coverage through the university
… Training
& locker room facilities
… Coaching
facilities (Office, etc.)
… Equipment
sharing between the men's and women's crew programs
… Ergometer
room facilities
… Club
Varsity status for increased legitimacy to assist with recruiting and retention
… Sports
information office coverage
… Information
dissemination through the Athletic Department (e.g. BucknellBison.com)
The changes to the team
would eliminate the University sponsored coaching position and University
funding. This would be
accomplished in a three-phased approach.
Phase 1
1.
Members of the Men's Crew team would be required to pay $350
per year due at the beginning of the second semester. This funding would cover the operating expenses of the team
that were once provided by the University.
2.
Coaching of the men's team would continue under the current
system with one head coach for both the men's and women's team. This salary and benefits would continue
to be funded by the University during Phase 1.
3.
A campaign for a men's crew endowment would begin and would be
lead by a Bucknell Men's Crew Alumni Association, which would be accountable to
the University for meeting the goals of this proposal. The endowment goals would be:
a. $1
Million dollars within 3 years to endow the Men's head coaching position
b. $3
Million dollars within 7 years to endow the Men's head coaching position and
the operating expenses of the team
Phase 2
1.
After the establishment of the $1 Million endowment, the
University funding of the Men's head coaching position would be eliminated.
2.
Members of the Men's crew team would still be required to pay
$350 in dues to the team for operating expenses.
Phase 3
1.
After the establishment of the $3 Million endowment, the
student dues system would be eliminated.
It is important to note that
during the implementation of this plan we ask that there not be roster caps
placed on the men's crew program.
Currently, the team is capped at twenty rowers. This allows for ten novice rowers and
ten varsity rowers. In order to ensure the success of this plan there needs to
be a strong group of current rowers to allow for a competitive athletic
experience, and to continue the historically successful fundraising efforts of
the crew team. This is not possible with a team that is held to twenty rowers.
We feel that this proposal
addresses the situation that faces the University and the Men's Crew team. We would appreciate the opportunity to
discuss the details of this proposal with you in person. Please feel free to contact any one of
us if any questions arise.
Thank you,
The Men's Crew Team Alumni
Committee
Michael Marquis '96
Victor Arcelus '96 M'98
Brian Burke '98
Tim Keen '97 M'00
Brad Peterson '96
James King '90
New Tiered System Recognizes
Club Varsity Status
Men's Crew and Men's Lacrosse First to be Elevated
ANN ARBOR, Mich.
-- University of Michigan Athletic Director Bill Martin announced today the
formation of a tiered club sports system. Under the new system club teams that
meet a newly established set of criteria can petition for elevation to
"club varsity" status.
Men's rowing and men's
lacrosse have been confirmed as the first two club teams to be elevated,
effective this fall. Both teams are coached by full-time coaches and their
staffs, and compete against national competition. John Paul coaches the
lacrosse team while Gregg Hartsuff coaches the men's rowing team.
The new system has been
established to recognize and increase support for club sports teams that have
reached a level of budget, organization and competition that is similar to
varsity levels. Club varsity squads are not necessarily closer to being
elevated to full varsity status, and will remain for the time being primarily
self-funded and administered through the Department of Recreational Sports. However,
the designation will give these teams a closer relationship to the U-M athletic
department.
After a one-year trial run
with rowing and lacrosse, every intercollegiate club sport will have the
opportunity to petition for club varsity status. Each team's eligibility and
acceptance will be based on a set of criteria that includes budget, coaching,
scheduling, practice time and student-athlete eligibility. Several women's club
teams, including ice hockey and figure skating, have been identified as possible
candidates in 2001.
The men's rowing team was
established in 1976 and has been nationally competitive with primarily walk-on
athletes. This past season men's rowing finished ninth of the 45 programs at
the Intercollegiate Rowing Association (IRA) National Championships. Michigan
was one of only two club programs to finish in the top 20 in 2000. Collegiate
men's rowing is governed by the IRA, which has determined club sports can
compete if they follow the version of the NCAA rules that the IRA adopts. For
the past four years the Michigan men have been the highest placing club at the
IRA's, and have defeated many fully supported varsity programs. Several
Michigan men's rowers have gone on to represent the United States in
international competition, most recently 2000 graduate Steve Warner, who won a
gold medal in the World Championships in August.
The men's lacrosse team,
which was established in 1965, draws many players who were recruited by varsity
programs out of high school but choose Michigan for its combination of academic
and athletic strengths. The team competes against other similar "virtual
varsity" club teams in the United States Lacrosse Intercollegiate
Associates. Last year, men's lacrosse compiled a 20-6 record en route to a
fifth-place national ranking and a one-goal loss in the national quarterfinals.
The lacrosse team's home field is Oosterbaan Fieldhouse, where it regularly
draws between 300-1,000 fans for home games.
Men's lacrosse head coach
John Paul expressed excitement over the changes. "We've been pushing for
this for some time, so it's gratifying to see that our guys will finally be
recognized for all the hard work they put in. They work so hard on the field
and in the classroom to represent Michigan well. It's great to see the University
acknowledge that dedication."
Article
from Michigan Universtity's Athletics website www.MGoBlue.com.
|